Likes

  • #13590255

    shared by kiri-girl on 2011-06-19

    1
  • #13232633

    shared by heavenkot on 2011-05-05

  • #13510687

    shared by lenheln on 2011-06-09

  • #12816684

    shared by elvismartinezsmith on 2011-03-18

    100 iso expired film pushed at 400 iso. I was going to visit the Rodin museum in Paris.. and fell on the Dior defilé during the fashion week... I took very few pics (there were so many photographers..) but it really is another world with all those fashion freaks hahaha...

    32
  • Forum des Halles

    shared by elvismartinezsmith on 2011-02-20

    100 iso slide pushed at 400

    2
  • La Villette

    shared by elvismartinezsmith on 2011-02-23

    100 iso expired slide pushed at 400... Check out this blog entry for the light flares challenge: http://www.lomography.com/homes/elvismartinezsmith/blog/8706-elvis-martinez-challenges-you-n2

    6
  • #11999529

    shared by fafascinado on 2010-10-22

    4
  • The Pinhegg – My Journey To Build An Egg Pinhole Camera

    written by francescco on 2011-04-23
    The Pinhegg – My Journey To Build An Egg Pinhole Camera

    Experimentation and doing what seems to be the impossible is the creed for every Lomographer. So, with a burst of inspiration and determination, i made my very own egg pinhole camera, the Pinhegg. The difficulties and effort were worth it!

    49
  • PinHolo - The story of how I made a Pine-Nut Pinhole Camera!

    written by francescco on 2011-04-22 #gear #tutorials
    PinHolo - The story of how I made a Pine-Nut Pinhole Camera!

    When I was a student at the Fine Arts Academy in Perugia, I fell in love with stenopeic photography and started gathering every kind of document I could about it and its technical evolution. I asked for some information from my photography teacher, Antonio Todini - He suggested that I search "Pinhole Photography" on the internet and as a way of remembering things said: “Pinhole, it sounds like pinolo (pine nut, in Italian), but with the 'H' after the 'N' and the final 'E'”. Since that moment the little nut planted itself in my mind and grew in the form of a challenge to make my very own pine nut pinhole camera!

    30
  • #12995749

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

    1
  • #12995752

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

  • #12995753

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

  • #12995754

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

  • #12995756

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

  • #12995757

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

  • #12995758

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

  • #12995760

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

    3
  • #12995761

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

  • #12995750

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The SFX yielded 12 rather flat but printable negatives. I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

    2
  • #12995634

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The Rollei yielded only 5 scannable negatives (overexposed). I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

    1
  • #12995632

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    The premise of this test was three films, shot under the same conditions. All three were shot in the same camera, same day. I metered for an arbitrary iso of 8 and bracketed (sometimes) one or two stops over, as you can't really meter for IR. All three rolls were then stand processed in Rodinal (1+100 for 1 hr). The Rollei yielded only 5 scannable negatives (overexposed). I'll take what I learned here and try again metering the films individually.

    2
  • #12995556

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    7
  • #12995557

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

  • #12995558

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    1
  • #12995543

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

  • #12995544

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    11
  • #12995545

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    3
  • #12995550

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    1
  • #12995552

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    1
  • #12995554

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

  • #12995555

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    1
  • #12995547

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    2
  • #12995548

    shared by troch on 2011-04-05

    47
  • #13000322

    shared by maximum_b on 2011-04-05

    1
  • #13000324

    shared by maximum_b on 2011-04-05

  • #13000325

    shared by maximum_b on 2011-04-05

  • #13000327

    shared by maximum_b on 2011-04-05

  • #13000328

    shared by maximum_b on 2011-04-05

  • #13000332

    shared by maximum_b on 2011-04-05