15 Comments

1. 
   cpolpa · 2010-12-06 18:48

   I think lomography is not naked at least a premeditated way. I think this kind of images they bring nothing positive to the spirit of Lomography. there are other sites more suitable for this type of situation.

2. 
   kiwikoh · 2010-12-07 03:30

   @polpa Although the photo is nice and artistic, but somehow....i agree with you.

3. 
   herbert-4 · 2010-12-07 03:37

   Very artistic, indeed. However, I, also, agree that Lomographic nakedness should be rather more organic, e.g. not Playboy Centerfold, but National Geographic centerfold.

4. 
   horaciorv · 2010-12-07 22:48

   I agree with Polpa ... by the way ... this photo could be anythIng but art ....

5. 
   maximum_b · 2010-12-07 23:17

   By the way, this film I've shot in as a brake during my commercial digital shootings. It was just for fun and I followed all those rules:
   1. Take your camera everywhere you go
   2. Use it any time – day and night
   3. Lomography is not an interference in your life, but part of it
   4. Try the shot from the hip
   5. Approach the objects of your Lomographic desire as close as possible
   6. Don't think (William Firebrace)
   7. Be fast
   8. You don't have to know beforehand what you captured on film
   9. Afterwards either
   10. Don't worry about any rules

   This is a hipshot, that's why it's so badly composed) And finally, do you see any rule here that picture should be beautiful and liked by everyone?

6. 
   wuxiong · 2010-12-08 01:39

   Golden rule no.11: Shoot anything naked or wrapped... Gagaga...

7. 
   60b · 2010-12-08 19:55

   Its not even softcore so I don't see what the problem is. If it was full frontal, yes there may be some issues but this to me, is fine.

8. 
   polarapfel · 2011-03-20 18:50

   Rule 10. Don't worry about any rules.

   Bring on the porn. Bring on the boobs, pussies, vaginas, penises (if you must) and so on. Nobody will stop you. However, I do have to agree that I won't watch everything...

9. 
   jonasatarao · 2011-06-17 11:42

   very hot scene!

10. 
    trip35snapper · 2011-11-12 21:12

    Can't see a problem with this shot, I think it looks great! I wish I had taken it. Nice one.

11. 
    hervinsyah · 2011-11-30 14:25

    PICTURE MEAN NOTHING, PEOPLE MEAN IT (READ IT FROM MY BORING COMMUNICATION TEXT BOOK :)

12. 
    adash · 2012-04-01 12:20

    @cpolpa, @horaciorv, @polarapfel: This photo is gorgeous, It has distorted colours, unusual (read: crappy) framing, and harsh lighting. Why isn't it worth it to be called a lomograph? What makes a lomograph of a dressed girl with distorted colours, crappy framing and harsh light better than this one?

13. 
    cpolpa · 2012-04-01 12:32

    @adash @ maximum_b I withdraw my comment. the picture is fantastic ;))

14. 
    horaciorv · 2012-04-02 11:34

    @adash whatever you think is ok ...

15. 
    polarapfel · 2012-05-19 22:15

    @adash Maybe I wouldn't write the same comment now that I did a year ago. Maybe I would. The fact stands that this community may be frequented by minors who shouldn't necessarily be subjected to this material. Without a proper screening/filter mechanism such as Flickr implemented, I would refrain from posting such images here. I never said that image was bad as in a bad photograph or not Lomography. I just expressed that it's not suitable to put it here.