What I Learned About Photo Equipment The Last 40 Years

2012-10-23 12

One man’s insight about the things he learned about photography and equipment in the past four decades. A definite must-read.

This post by longtime analogue photgrapher and redditor Tenzing Norgay* has been recently making rounds all over photography websites and blogs such as PetaPixel and I Shoot Film.

While it can’t be denied that it is a bit of a lengthy read, it can be assured that the time you spend doing so is not wasted.

Don’t forget to leave your own insights below!

Credits: dudizm

What I Learned About Photo Equipment The Last 40 Years by Tenzing Norgay

This entire story is about black-and-white film shooting, but I hope there are good lessons in this for you youngsters shooting digital. Hopefully, you won’t take this as being arrogant, condescending, or hectoring. I offer this in the spirit of something I’ve found to be fascinating for some four decades.

I have been a very active photographer for most of the past 40+ years. In my early days, I thought I wanted to be a pro and actually worked as a photo assistant and freelance shooter while still in my teens. I rapidly learned that photography was wired into me — I don’t breathe right if I don’t get to make pictures or go into the darkroom regularly.

I also learned that I just hated the business of photography: it’s the difference between being a painter and a house painter. To this day, I just cringe inside when someone says, “Bring a camera, we want pictures of Thanksgiving/Christmas/birthdays/etc…”

Credits: michell & superlighter

A few years ago, I noticed that most of my serious portfolio photos and wall hangings were from the midpoint of my shooting career onward. I had very little from my early days. So, with decades of improvement in my darkroom skills, I went back to the earliest negatives to fill out a “best of” set.

As I looked at the work of the young me, I realized a couple of things: (1) I wasn’t half bad as a young kid, and (2) The pictures had a lot of technical imperfections and limitations. Uh oh… Another project began to form in my mind. I needed to find out whether the problem was the equipment of the day or whether it was my problem.

See, as I progressed as a photographer, every “upgrade” of camera meant I had to sell the old one. That meant I didn’t ever really do direct comparisons of how much of an “upgrade” it really was. But film cameras are relatively cheap on eBay now, and I’m fairly good at fixing up the basics. “So”, I thought, “I shall reacquire every great camera I’ve ever owned, get it working again, and see just how much of a difference there is between the old stuff and my newest super-duper stuff”.

Credits: dont_think, camera-gas & vicuna

My benchmark would be my modern workhorses: a Hasselblad V system and a Wisner 4×5 Technical Field camera with superb lenses from Schneider, Rodenstock, and Artar. I shoot 99.9% monochrome and have a great darkroom, so I could control the entire testing cycle. The other thing I decided is that I was NOT going to shoot resolution charts or do densiometric testing. I would do this by making real pictures.

I’d just created a monster. Over the years, I’ve shot in every format from 16mm to 4×5, and with almost every major brand at one point or another. It’s not an exaggeration to say that I’ve probably shot nearly a hundred different combinations of brands and formats. I therefore had to limit myself to cameras I actually loved and used regularly, not something I owned briefly or did not use.

The final list ended up being this (an X next to it means I’ve got it, and it’s fully functional. This is in the order I got them in the first place, though not in the order that I reacquired them):

With each camera I acquired, I made sure I got it working. In a few cases, I had a repair tech go through them to do CLAs and light maintenance. The hardest one to do was the Baby Speed Graphic because it was made over 60 years ago and parts are… hard to find. McMaster-Carr saved my bacon on that one. I rebuilt that sucker by hand and it works flawlessly now.

I want to emphasize that, while I love all this hardware, I am NOT “collecting” it. I looked for decent condition stuff, but not prisine mint collectibles. I want to USE it to do the “Was it me or was it the equipment?” experiment. Along the way, this also morphed into “How does the old stuff compare with the new?”

So, I started fixing them and shooting with them, sometimes for weeks, more often for months. Along the way, I learned some really important things about photography and — even more importantly — about myself as a photographer:

Credits: ehmahh, sammi80 & ibkc

The problem with my old pictures was 99% me. They were failings of technique, not limitations of the equipment. For example, the stuff I just shot last year with the Nikon F doesn’t compare to my modern medium and large-format stuff — I wouldn’t expect it to given the format differences. BUT, it is better than 90% of the medium format stuff I shot 40 years ago. That, friends and neighbors, is a lack of technique.

The young me had a pretty good sense of composition and lighting, and no chops to consistently deliver results. My old negs are thin, hard to print, and infuriating because I know exactly what I was trying to pull off; I just couldn’t.

40 years of technique improvements makes a huge difference. I can command these old cameras to do things now that I wouldn’t have even understood 4 decades ago. I can pull things out of a print in a darkroom I didn’t even know were possible back then.

Format matters more than equipment. A 30-year-old medium-format camera with a decent lens will equal or better all but the very highest-end modern DSLRs. By “better”, I mean better dynamic range, tonal rendering, and acuity. Make that a 4×5 and it beats everything in sight. No amount of tweaking and begging can make even the most recent 35mm negs do what even a 645 can handle. It’s physics, not magic.

Credits: kekskonstrukt, tsnsak & superlighter

The old optics were way better than anyone realizes. The Baby Speed Graphic has a 101mm Ektar on it and this lens is so sharp you can shave with it. It’s ridiculous how good those old lens designers were. Similarly, the late model Mamiya TLR and 645 lenses are absolutely top rate.

My favorite old Nikon lenses still fit my modern Nikon DSLR. The 24mm f/2.8 and the 105mm f/2.5 are arguably the best lenses Nikon ever made. The 105mm on the Nikkormat body rocks as a handheld portrait camera.

The difference in image quality between the oldest (Baby Speed) and newest (Hasselblad V) is invisible to me. This is a bit disappointing, considering that the Baby Speed cost me about $300 all in with parts and I paid north of $3000 for a single ‘Blad lens some years ago. But, part of this is the difference in format: 6×6 vs 6×9 is a BIG difference in neg real estate.

My favorite format will always be 6×9. It’s a huge neg without a huge camera. It starts to approach 4×5 in quality but you can hand hold and do street shooting with it. I am so itching to find a Mamiya Universal at a decent price.

I never even came close to realizing the potential of that Yashica — probably because I was trying to use the onboard meter, which is nearly useless. But the lens and body? Amazing.

Credits: maiitran & grinningcat

Some cameras just feel right in my hands. The Hassy and the Fuji are top-quality pieces of gear, but I never feel like they are an extension of me. On the other hand, the Baby Speed, the Mamiyas, and the old Nikons just put me into a subconcious flow of work. The Wisner puts me on another planet. The lesson here is that the gear doesn’t make that much difference EXCEPT that it causes you to work in different ways and thereby be receptive to different possibilities.

I hope to do this for a long time yet. If the Good Lord allows, I think I’d like my last breath to either be looking through a camera, or with my hands in fixer.

*Tenzing Norgay is a pseudonym used by the writer. The real Tenzing Norgay (aka the first person to set foot on the summit of Mt. Everest along side Sir Edmund Hillary) died way back in 1986. Don’t worry, it took me a while to realize this as well.

written by geegraphy on 2012-10-23 #news #tips #equipment #lessons #viral #photography #news #reddit


  1. clownshoes
    clownshoes ·

    Deep stuff.

  2. dollymixture
    dollymixture ·

    Great article : )

  3. walasiteodito
    walasiteodito ·

    good read!

  4. rbruce63
    rbruce63 ·

    I found the old negatives from my youth, Flickr and a group for the Yashica Electro 35 that you have photographed in your gallery, had her fixed and revived my enthusiasm for photography back! I am doing tricks with my old GSN that I never dreamed of when the camera was,given to me by dad in 1979! I still own my Maxxum 600si which is a technical marvel but feel transported back in time with my Yashica!

    I guess that what you portray in this article, is an age related issue. To revisit the past memoirs preserved in negatives is a means to track your bearings and evaluate one's life. I discovered that besides landscapes that we used in our printing shop calendars, I like to take pictures of people, of gatherings, of trips, capture expressions. My main subject today is my 8 years of age son.

    By the way, dad gave me his Mamiya Standard press and I have had the film back seals replaced!

    Thanks for your article, I had enjoyed it thoroughly and can relate, in a proportional way, to go are you feeling!


    San José, Costa Rica

  5. saintempire
    saintempire ·

    Quality reading :)

  6. -zoe
    -zoe ·

    I love this, and all of the photos attached, so many film cameras, its beautiful!

  7. buckshot
    buckshot ·

    I love all those camera-collection shots! Anyone with a shot like this is welcome to submit it here too: www.lomography.com/homes/buckshot/blog/78512-oh-so-you-thin…

  8. adam_g2000
    adam_g2000 ·

    Fantastic. Nice find.

  9. berndtotto
    berndtotto ·

    Agree with the writer, especially regarding the medium- and large format stuff. Yes, size still matters in photography !!!

  10. davidpowell
    davidpowell ·

    Great article and very inspriational. If I wasn't in the store I'd be out shooting right now!

  11. bsdunek
    bsdunek ·

    Good artical. Yes, it's the photographer, not the equipment. I agree with the quality of the lenses. If one looks at lens tests, some of todays lenses are not as good as from the 60's. I think it's because they try to save cost, and decied what is "good enough". I love my Nikon F's, and yes, the lenses are tops. My Mamiya Press Super 23 is one of my favorites. The lens is great and the 6X7 and 6X9 formats are big enough to bring out everything. I use mostly Ilford FP4 and love it.

  12. lucyfluerjenner
    lucyfluerjenner ·

    Great article loved it

More Interesting Articles

  • LomoAmigo Wilson Wong Shoots with the Jupiter 3+ Art Lens

    written by Jill Tan Radovan on 2016-05-02 #people
    LomoAmigo Wilson Wong Shoots with the Jupiter 3+ Art Lens

    Wilson Wong is passionate about quite a few things, and photography is just one of them. He is also a trusted gadget reviewer and lifestyle writer in Singapore and a respected key opinion leader. Hear what he has to say about shooting with the Jupiter 3+ Art Lens.

  • First Impressions of the New Jupiter 3+ Lens: AM Renault of Yamanaka Yuko

    written by phyllistc on 2016-02-29 #people
    First Impressions of the New Jupiter 3+ Lens: AM Renault of Yamanaka Yuko

    Photographer AM Renault is a core member of Yamanaka Yuko and Six Dimen Boy. He is deeply in love with nature, a thing he always intertwines with photography and design. This time, Lomography is honored to have AM Renault shoot with the New Jupiter 3+ Art Lens. What's more, one of his photos has been chosen as the cover of the product package.

  • From Experimental to Ordinary: LomoAmigo Martin Dietrich Tests the Minitar-1 Art Lens

    written by Lomography on 2016-01-29 #people
    From Experimental to Ordinary: LomoAmigo Martin Dietrich Tests the Minitar-1 Art Lens

    In order to escape the world of facts and figures, tax auditor Martin Dietrich discovered photography as his creative counterpart almost seven years ago. On a trip to Paris he fell in love with analog photography and the magic of film has been fascinating to him since then. But he also appreciates the benefits of digital photography. For Lomography he tested the Lomo LC-A Minitar-1 Art Lens on his Fuji X-Pro 1 camera. Check out Martin's photos and learn more about the founder of the popular Neoprime magazine.

    2016-01-29 3
  • Shop News

    The Lomography Bazaar

    The Lomography Bazaar

    We constantly search far and wide, meticulously seek out, hunt down, and hand-pick some of the most experimental and alternative gear out there - and we've now gathered them all in one easy to browse shop category, ready for the picking! In the Lomo-Bazaar, you canalso be part of our process of collecting fresh new products, rare treasures, and crowd-funded creations to sell on the shop - after all, they’re all for you! Get in touch with us to share your suggestions for amazing gear - go on, we’re all ears!

  • 'A'r' - a New Series by Armin Amirian

    written by Jill Tan Radovan on 2016-02-04 #people
    'A'r' - a New Series by Armin Amirian

    Last year, Armin Amirian talked to Lomography about his motivations as an artist, his inspiration for his work and the difficulty of pursuing his passion in the society he belongs to. With that came a collection of images that reflected the concerns he and his fellow countrymen are faced with every day. The Iran-based photographer returns with insight on his new body of work.

    2016-02-04 3
  • Diving Into The Unknown: An Interview With Boogie

    written by Ivana Džamić on 2016-12-01 #people
    Diving Into The Unknown: An Interview With Boogie

    Photography became his creative escape in the 90's when his country was facing a civil war. Years later, he moved to New York where he continued doing what he loves the most. Boogie had various exhibitions over the years and his sixth monograph "A Wah Do Dem" was one of the most controversial ones.

  • First Impressions of the New Jupiter 3+ Art Lens: Maxime Fardeau

    written by Lomography on 2016-01-22 #people
    First Impressions of the New Jupiter 3+ Art Lens: Maxime Fardeau

    Maxime Fardeau, or Max as he is fondly called, loves film. He has been shooting analogue for about four years and owns a number of 35mm film and instant cameras, such as the Leica M6 and SLR-670 Polaroid. He has taken photos using the Lomo'Instant and the Minitar-1 Art Lens and this time around, he provides a glimpse of the images she produced with the Jupiter 3+ Art Lens.

    2016-01-22 2
  • Shop News

    Daguerreotype Achromat 2.9/64 Art Lens goes live in the online shop!

    Daguerreotype Achromat 2.9/64 Art Lens goes live in the online shop!

    Do you long for the dreamy soft focus that only the Daguerreotype Achromat 2.9/64 Art Lens can give your photos? Grab it in the lens mount of your choice! Brass versions are now available for purchase in the shop!

  • Memorable Quotes From Our 2015 Photographer Interviews (Part I)

    written by Julien Matabuena on 2015-12-19
    Memorable Quotes From Our 2015 Photographer Interviews (Part I)

    In 2015 we had been fortunate enough to talk with photographers, with practices and insights unique from one another, from all over the globe. And not only were we able to see their works; we were also able to dig a little deeper and find out what makes each one of them tick. In this special recap, we present a handpicked selection of insightful quotes from some of our most memorable interviews this year.

  • Long Exposures Around Europe with the Minitar-1 Art Lens

    written by antoniocastello on 2015-12-10 #gear #places
    Long Exposures Around Europe with the Minitar-1 Art Lens

    One of the things I like the most about the Minitar-1 Art lens is how sharp the focus can be when you shoot with a small aperture. So if you are one of those that like to shoot at night, get a tripod, add this to a late dark winter afternoon, and you will end up with a bunch of beautiful long exposures. This is what I did on my last trip to Europe.

    2015-12-10 4
  • How Traveling and a Petri Compact Made Me Fall Back in Love with Photography

    written by Ma. Virginia Parra on 2016-04-12
    How Traveling and a Petri Compact Made Me Fall Back in Love with Photography

    Because here’s the thing about film photography that I doubt a digital camera can give you: Permanence, photographs that truly and literally stay with you, not just in a physical form but also in your head and in your heart.

    2016-04-12 1
  • Shop News

    Save 15% on Lomography Film when bought with the Lubitel!

    Save 15% on Lomography Film when bought with the Lubitel!

    This beautiful camera features such ability to let users choose and switch between 35mm or 120 formats! Shoot more, save more! Get 15% discount on Lomography Films when you purchase film with the Lubitel camera!

  • Film Format Fun: 126 Instamatic Film

    written by Maaike van Stratum (@stratski) on 2016-03-23 #gear #tutorials
    Film Format Fun: 126 Instamatic Film

    We all know about 35mm and 120 film, right? And since Lomography re-introduced 110 film, we have another film format to play with. But in the years past, many more film formats were in use. Let me introduce you to a few golden oldies and tell you about my experiences with them. Here's how I revived my Instamatic cameras.

    2016-03-23 8
  • The Women Building the History of Fashion Photography

    written by Ciel Hernandez on 2016-03-09
    The Women Building the History of Fashion Photography

    There are two things a woman can do with the camera: be on front of it, or behind it. Join Lomography's celebration of International Women's Month by learning more about ladies in fashion photography.

  • The Beauty of Natural Imperfections: An Interview with Samuel Zeller

    written by Teresa Sutter on 2016-03-23 #people
    The Beauty of Natural Imperfections: An Interview with Samuel Zeller

    Samuel Zeller is a Swiss photographer who finds visual pleasure in man-made environments. In this interview, he talks to Lomography about the painterly aspect of photography, the value of a print, and the role of instinct in a creative project.

  • Find Out More About