Have an account? Login | New to Lomography? Register | Lab | Current Site:

Quickie Tipster: Cheat the System (and Get More for Your Money)

Do you like to stick it to The Man? Are you just super cheap? If you're one, the other, or both, you may want to get extra shots our of your roll of 35mm film.

Hey there photo rebel, are you ready for me to lay something on you? The Man tells you that rolls of 35mm have 24 exposures or 36 exposures, but what he doesn’t want you to know is that you can totally get some extra shots out of it!

What you need:
• A roll of 35mm film
• A camera you want to load it in
• Uh… Your hands and fingers, I guess?

First, without pulling any of the film tag out, put your film canister in the film room of your camera and lock in the rewind knob. Then, depending on the manner in which you must load your camera, pull out the minimum amount of film to put it in the slot in the film spool/make the teeth grab it; then, simply advance just a couple of clicks, to make sure the film is going to stay in place and close the back. Ignore the directions that say to “shoot a frame or two with the lens cap on”, just have at it, start shooting the second you can get the shutter to fire! You will likely get a “film burned” shot at the beginning of your roll, but I think it’s tasteful (I’ve included some examples), and if you do it right, I’ve found you can get 26 or 27 exposures out of a 24 exposure roll, and 40 or 41 out of a 36 exposure roll. And hey, who doesn’t love extra frames? Just keep in mind your first shot will probably have some kind of burned left edge, and go nuts! The Man can’t stop you now!

written by nation_of_pomation


  1. vicuna


    Some cameras have ingenious loading systems and use a minimum of space between each shot: for example, the legendary Canon Canonet QL 17 GIII (QL is for Quick Loading) uses a great loading system that wastes a minimum of film and I usually can have 40 pictures out of a 36 exp film...
    But you're right, don't waste film while you insert it!! :))

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  2. nation_of_pomation


    The only bad thing about that camera was the first Canon rangefinder not compatible with Leica-mount lenses, I'm pretty sure, but yeah, that is a pretty awesome feature. This is just something you can get a toy to do, too, but with just a little effort.

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  3. vicuna


    Yes, of course, with some loading practice you can really save some more shots on any camera! :))

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  4. eastmoe


    try load the film in the darkroom..i have try load 24 exposures film and i get 28-29 frame..in the darkroom need some skill to put the film in the slot to make the teeth grab it..hehe

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  5. 0live


    whatever I love wasting film... its freeing for me

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  6. nation_of_pomation


    That would definitely work, @eastmoe. My darkroom on campus isn't that close to my room, but there's always locking myself in the closet with the lights off.
    And saving money is freeing for my wallet, so then I can get more film.

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  7. simon-hedge


    With some of the REALLY plastic cameras, the film is stronger than the camera. You end up breaking the mechanism trying to get one more frame. I've done this to TWO cameras! D'Oh!

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  8. rav_bunneh


    On my lomo lc-a+ I can normally get 38 - 40 photos in a roll. Though normally one is that lovely cut-off first frame of the roll. I love those.

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  9. nation_of_pomation


    I do too, I normally shoot my first shot with that in mind because it happens pretty consistently for me.

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  10. chaoticsense


    Awesome tip! Thanks!

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  11. superlighter


    I usually stick the lead of the film to the wind roll of my LCA with a small piece of tape, this allow me to take 39, 40 photos out of a 36exp film.

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  12. odjur


    Oh I've always done this, accidentally in the first place but when I found out it worked okay, I kept doing it. Great tipster, I lóve the first photo effect

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  13. fivedayforecast


    Wait are you serious? Cameras tell you to do that? That's just sort of an obvious for me I guess...

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  14. nation_of_pomation


    It was for me too, and I do realize this is pretty common sense, but a lot of camera manuals have a generic line in there somewhere that basically make you waste the first two shots. That's why most cameras have an S on the dial, then normally one or two lines before you ever actually get to 1.

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  15. stickyvinny



    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  16. kearz10


    i do this all the time. lol. at first i didnt realize i was doing it, and i got confused as to how many exposure i actualy had. i teach this to all my lomo friends now. lol. :)
    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  17. kiteflyin


    I love the film burn effect. I've only done this once though... accidentally.

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  18. pangmark


    Nice to see so many slaves thriving to be the master!!

    about 4 years ago · report as spam
  19. madmou


    Thanks for the tip. I got 42 exposures on a 36 film! I hope it happens again.

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam

Read this article in another language

This is the original article written in: English. It is also available in: Italiano, Deutsch & Português.