This four part mini-series sets out to review my four favorite lenses. All these lenses share a commonality: they are all M42 lenses. I love the M42 standard. Canon and Nikon, and later Pentax are all proprietary; the M42 is not. We begin with the Helios 44-4 M.
Photo by adam_g2000
There must be hundreds of different Single Lens Reflex (SLR) Cameras available, and whenever you get a new one, it’s tempting to review it. It’s nice to know how light or heavy one is, or what features it has, but the truth is, all that they do is open and close a shutter. The unsung hero of the SLR is the lens on the front — these do the hard work and light leaks aside, these impart the real character into your images. The quality of the glass, the coating, and the age can all make a huge difference to your pictures.
It was first introduced in Zeiss’ Contax S of 1949, this branch of Zeiss also sold lenses as Pentacon, then Praktica. Also, Zenit and Pentax used this mount. This means there are many, many lenses available, and unlike Canon’s and Nikon’s, they are often very cheap.
We Lomographers have a penchant for Russian lenses and cameras, so I’ll start the series with my latest acquisition, and my new best friend: my Helios 44-4M.
Photo by adam_g2000
Helios-44 is a series of standard lenses for SLR cameras, produced in Soviet Union by KMZ. It is considered to be one of most mass produced lenses ever. The 44-4 M is multicoated.
The focal length is perfect for people, very wide and very telephoto can squish and lengthen features. The Helios is around the same as our eyes, so people look great, very natural.
- Focal Length: 58mm
- Aperture Range: f/2 – f/16
- Angle of View: 40°28
- Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.5m (you can get really, really close!)
The Helios seems to be a little harder to focus than my other lenses, I cannot think why. It’s bright at f2, so when not stopped down it should be the same.
When well focused, it can be very, very sharp - one of the reasons I turn to an SLR.
When used aperture wide open, the bokeh is soft, not jarring and can give you some wonderful effects. I can’t wait to try it at night.
I think it lowers the contrast in pictures, softening out the colours and creating a mild dreamlike effect.
This particular shot has rapidly become one of my most liked, I believe it’s due to the wonderful dreamlike aspect of the lens and those softer contrast colours. Once again, notice the beautiful bokeh here.
To finish, I think I will end up using this lens most for portrait work. Its milder contrast makes for lovely skin tone, its focal length is perfect for narrowing faces a little and taking good close shots without getting in your subject’s face.









11 comments
adam_g2000
ERRATA: "It was first introduced in Zeiss’ Contax S of 1949, this branch of Zeiss... should be "The M42 standard was first introduced in Zeiss’ Contax S of 1949, this branch of Zeiss..." & "When well focused, it can be very, very sharp" should not have a line through it.
alex34
Nice reiew-I agree that M42 mount lenses are great, the Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar is my personal favourite.
alex34
'review' :)
icuresick
I am using one now for my DSLR. It has an adaptor for Canon EOS.
I would love to use it for may Canon EOS Kiss SLR, but it still need a repair after it hit the ground :(
utterlee
neanderthalis
After brining my Zenit 412ls back into rotation, I decided to splurge on a used 28mm lens. You are right in that used are not that expensive when compared to used Canon FD lenses, it is trusting the condition of the lens with online sellers. I got this one from a reputable box store's online division. It should arrive this weekend and be tested soon. I see that there are a few new lenses available in M42, but are not cheap. I may save up for one. Nice review & shots by the way.
adam_g2000
@icuresick I was thinking of getting an adaptor for my film and DSLR canons. Can you focus to infinity properly?
adam_g2000
@alex34 that's one I don't have. I do have the flektagon and have a love hate relationship with it. That's the one I'll review next.
adam_g2000
@utterlee Most handhelds, point and shoot and zooms do seem most useful at a wide angle, and I will admit my 35mm is the one I use the most, but yes - for people and certain things this one is great. You don't have to step forward to shoot everyday things!
adam_g2000
@neanderthalis I've always wanted a 28mm, never gotten around to it. Let me know what type and how you get on. Perhaps you could write a 5th article in this series?
icuresick
I use it mostly for close up and portrait shots, using Canon's Live View. It is sharp, with little softness at the corners.