Have an account? Login | New to Lomography? Register | Lab | Current Site:

The Pros & Cons of C-41 Black & White Film

There's a reason why the best black and white films out there are meant for traditional developing. While C-41 monochrome is convenient to process, the results aren't so impressive. I shot one roll during a beach holiday and was a little put off by how washed out and grey it turned out.

Photo by denisesanjose

I received an unbranded roll of black and white 35mm film for C-41 processing on Christmas and decided to use it during my trip to Tali with my college best friends.

Since we were heading to the beach, I loaded it into my cheap underwater film camera which was my primary mistake. It had no ISO options whatsoever so I couldn’t manually over or underexpose.

Daytime indoor photos look okay, but you’ll notice the dirt and scratches. (It was probably expired too.) Under the afternoon sun though, the photos look white-washed and more grey than black and white.

I was hoping to get high contrasts but I guess that’s what you sacrifice for the convenience of C-41 processing. And maybe my camera was becoming light leak-y as well.

After a dip in Coral Beach, we headed back to the house to celebrate my friend’s birthday! Flash photos at al fresco dinner turned out alright and was hoping the rest of the roll registered like this.

When we decided to go nightswimming at the pool and stargazing at the roof deck though, this film didn’t do so well. Probably because it was also really dark and there were no other light sources.

We were supposed to go sailing the next day but 1) the sailing yacht’s battery died, 2) we couldn’t get another one from the marina, and 3) even if we did, the boat’s busted engine would still keep us at bay. Bummer! We explored Tali instead and ended up on Sunset Beach where a little trekking led us to what I now call “Inception Beach.”

There were blocks of half-laid concrete in the shallow end of the water (maybe from an attempt to build a dock/bridge?) as well as a lot of naturally-formed rocks and boulders. I thought it was beautiful in a derelict way and it really reminded me of the Limbo scenes in Inception. It was really sunny out that day so, at this point, I’ve come to accept the grayish tones of this monochrome film.

One thing I did like about it was how well it captured light underwater! Too bad I only took a single shot. I guess this film was a one-hit wonder.

Photo by denisesanjose

In the end, I’m glad that at least the photos turned out, given how mysterious the film was (no brand, no expiry date, etc.). I’ve grown to like the nostalgic look the film gave off but I do wish there was more contrast and that it was less gray. But at least the sun-drenched, sand-dusted film matched the beach trip’s feel.

Now I know to invest in cult classic B&W films (like Kodak T-MAX or Lomography Lady Grey), even if labs that develop it are rare, so I’m sure of the look that I’m getting. If I do find more C-41 monochrome rolls later in life, I’d still try them out for easy-to-process black and whites. I just wouldn’t expect so much of them.

See more photos from this roll in Talifornia.

written by denisesanjose


  1. sixsixty


    Ha! Totally agree, the c-41 B&W films are just trash. Stick to the conventional and try developing yourself!

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  2. cyan-shine


    I greatly respect your opinions, but maybe you should give chromogenic monochrome films another chance:

    I'm not saying my images are better, but I am saying that you can get acceptable results with those films :D

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  3. brianr62


    Looks like you used ISO 400 film. The problem with the daylight images is they are overexposed and the lab printed them improperly.
    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  4. denisesanjose


    @sixsixty Yeah, and it's fun to DIY develop too!

    @cyan-shine Nice photos! Alas, those brands aren't available where I'm from but I'd love to try them out if I manage to score some.

    @brianr62 I figured. Better luck next time. ;-)

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  5. cyan-shine


    Yeah, @brianr62 pinned it, these are almost all 400 ISO films. Message me @denisesanjose and I can send you some ;D

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  6. cyan-shine


    I loved your pics btw ;D

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  7. denisesanjose


    Thank you, @cyan-shine! :-)

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  8. wilfbiffherb


    you need to adjust contrast in post processing - i know lomoheads dont like to but not doing it is just silly. its even done in the wet darkroom.

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  9. clownshoes


    Yes, despite the light leaks; a little tweaking in curves after or during scanning would really made these shots pop.

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  10. freelancer


    Trashy "cheap underwater film camera" and no ISO options.... What do expect? A miracle? Overexposed beach-pics, underexposed indoor-pics and overexposed indoors w/flash - try to find the error!! But it´s not fair to blame the C41 b/w-films.

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  11. chetsellars

    I don't tknow that you're being fair in blaming all c-41 b&w films. I use The Kodak wannabe B&W and get pretty respectable results with it. They're not the same as regular b&w, but they're pretty good in their own right. I think with everything you had going against you-- unmarked film, no iso option (at the beach, stopping down is always a good idea), and no post-processing... you're very lucky to have any results at all. I do love the underwater picture. It looks so surreal!

    over 2 years ago · report as spam
  12. cmgawthorp93


    I don't agree. I really love Kodak's B&W C-41 films. I think that the camera choice was the real problem here. I've had beautiful contrasts and glows with the film.

    about 2 years ago · report as spam
  13. af-capture


    yeap...i dont agree. i really love ilford xp2 super...and I am positive you can get good results with kodak's c-41 b&w...i am with @freelancer and @cmgawthorp93 on this one.

    about 2 years ago · report as spam

Read this article in another language

This is the original article written in: English. It is also available in: Português.