This is your last chance to pre-order your Petzval Lens and get the special aperture plates included for free! With estimated delivery in August (or even sooner), don’t miss out on securing your picture perfect portrait lens!

Have an account? Login | New to Lomography? Register | Lab | Current Site:

The Fuji Chrome T64 120 Color Explosion

With the Fuji T64 120 (Tungsten) film your pictures might get a great colour explosion, but you have to choose your subjects wisely. Otherwise, you will probably wonder about pale pictures like I did. As this is a great film, you should take care to achieve those great popping colours you aim for. Read on after the jump!

Photo by bloomchen

About three weeks ago I was on my way out in the morning and the weather was so sunny that I thought I had to load the Holga CFN I had in my bag to take some pictures. I already had two loaded cameras in my bag but thought, “it’s Holga time!” Unfortunately, a quick look in my bag showed that I had only one roll of slide film left — a roll of Fuji Velvia 100 which I had already planned to shoot at a special occasion.

But just around the corner where I was at that moment, there was a Photolab, so I stopped there to get me some rolls of slide film. I asked what they had in stock and my choice was the Fuji Chrome T64 (Tungsten). A good choice I thought because I already had used the Lomography X-Tungsten 64 35mm and so I knew what I could expect: great, colourful shots!

So I loaded my Holga and as I had to buy a few things here and there it was just perfect to take pictures on my way. At least that’s what I thought. But sometimes things are not like what you think they are. I took a single shot of that pigeon above sitting on the window sill of a school. I didn’t see anything else that was worth stopping for and shooting at. So the Holga remained loaded with 11 pictures left in my bag.
A few days later, I was playing a Beach Tournament and took another single shot of a parasol. Perfect Tungsten opportunity, I thought: blue sky, a cloud, and something else on the picture. But again, nothing more.

Photo by bloomchen

Again, after some days I took another single shot — a double exposure — of this woman relaxing on the bench and the clouds. Normally, I shoot rolls within a day or two. I had a hard time with this roll.

Photo by bloomchen

I was getting a bit impatient with this roll so I took the opportunity on the next sunny day to go to a street corner, where there are a lot of people pass by on street market days. At that time I didn´t care anymore about the light conditions and sun and whatever to get this great Tungsten atmosphere on the pictures.

After finishing the roll I went to the lab to get it developed. I got it back the same day and was really pretty satisfied with the results. Except for one multiple exposure I took, all shots have strong colours. Exactly what I had expected. I could still see the difference between those shots with good light and those with a bit less light, but definitely, those are the Tungsten-x-pro shots I wanted.

I had another roll I loaded my Seagull 4A with it and thought I’ll shoot some more of these amazing colourful pictures. It must have been only two or three days later when I went for a walk with the baby and got enough opportunities to shoot the entire roll during this walk. This time it took me only about 2 1/2 hours. When I got the roll back from the lab I was a bit disappointed, and asked myself, “Where did all the colors go?” It looked so pale. But I didn’t really take a closer look on the pictures and what was on them. I even thought that the roll was not cross processed, but the scanner settings told something different.

Photo by bloomchen

The only shots I really liked very much were those two of these guys chilling outside a hospital on a bench and a wheel chair.

Being disappointed I didn’t think much about it anymore. But a few days later, I took another look at the Holga shots and those taken with the Seagull 4A. Comparing those two rolls opened my eyes. Without noticing I almost hadn’t shot any colorful subjects on the second roll and if you don’t have strong colors, cross processing doesn’t help in matters of pale colours.

I shot an all white building with only a hint of colour (the flowers on the balcony you can’t really see), and I took this shot exactly to show this:

Photo by bloomchen

I took a shot of a building with flags and a banner on the balcony to capture the mood of a non-football-fan in between football-fanatics:

Photo by bloomchen

Then, I shot a backyard where there is a parking of a supermarket. A shot I really like but without strong colours:

Photo by bloomchen

A parking deck, and again a parking of a supermarket, plus an overexposed picture:

The three photos remaining have colorful subjects, and therefore, are pretty much different from all the others (except the two guys):

Conclusion: You can’t be wrong with this film unless you keep in mind that a colorful cross processed shot needs color on the picture itself. It could be a nice effect having only a blur of colour on the picture — as long as you achieve to capture it well — but if you think about it, you might also come across what I think about it: that’s not the reason why I use slide film. I can get strong contrast with black and white film either way.

I really like this film and I have already in mind on which occasion I’ll shoot my next roll. Next time, I’ll really take care and think twice about what I want to capture with it. Then, I can hopefully show you some color explosions that you’ll like.

Thanks for reading!

written by bloomchen

1 comment

  1. neanderthalis


    Nice Article :)

    about 2 years ago · report as spam