Have an account? Login | New to Lomography? Register | Lab | Current Site:

Kodak Elitechrome EBX: Amazing Colours

Well, it's a film that's definitely worth trying. You will get hooked on it easily!

Well, I’d say out of the big pool of slides I have tried, including Kodak EB, Agfa CT100 (both versions), Kodak 320T, Fuji Sensia, Lomography X-Pro 200, I like this one, EBX, most. The reason is simple, the colour shift is amazing! Luckily, it became available in Hong Kong since some time ago!

Compared to Kodak Elitechrome 100 (EB), the colour shift in Elitechrome Extra colour (EBX) is ‘more’. For some photos it gives a yellow tone. Sometimes, the yellow tone merges beautifully with the blue sky. Well, here’s how it goes with Voigtlander VITO CLR.

In some photos, the colours are rather saturated. Of course, the colour shift is very good as well. The red colour is pretty sharp. Occasionally, it gives a green tone. However, don’t care too much about the tone, as it depends on a lot of factors! I mainly use it with my LC-A+.

I have also tried to do double exposure with this roll, the result wasn’t bad at all! Red is particularly sharp is this roll.

Moreover, this roll is pretty good with taking portraits, as it doesn’t give some extreme colour shifts that will scar your subject off when they see it.

written by phoenix1206

4 comments

  1. le_ors

    le_ors

    did you develope in C41 or E6?
    I have just one roll of these, i'm saving it for my bday (maybe at the beach), here it's very difficult to get different film from kodak pro image 100.

    about 3 years ago · report as spam
  2. feelux

    feelux

    Amazing colors :)

    about 3 years ago · report as spam
  3. phoenix1206

    phoenix1206

    I ask the shop to develop it with cross processing, using C41.

    about 3 years ago · report as spam
  4. christielam

    did you say you can get this in hong kong?! which shops do you buy your films from? I have been looking everywhere for it but I seem to only find normal film! also how much is a pack roughly? thanks :)
    almost 3 years ago · report as spam