This is your last chance to pre-order your Petzval Lens and get the special aperture plates included for free! With estimated delivery in August (or even sooner), don’t miss out on securing your picture perfect portrait lens!

Have an account? Login | New to Lomography? Register | Lab | Current Site:

Black and White with Bite

Want a black and white film with good colouring and contrast that has C-41 develop? Ilford FP4+ could be your solution!

Ilford FP4+ was my first ever black and white film and these shots are from my first ever roll. I know some people aren’t very keen on C-41 processed black and white images, and that’s fine by me, but i’m not going to stop using this film. With the right exposure this film does really well, good contrast and detail and great blurring and vignetting around the outer reaches of your frame. It seems to give a slightly vintage look to the photos you take as well, which i love. Why not grab a roll next time you see some and see what you can make.

written by wilfbiffherb


  1. simon-hedge


    FP4 Plus is NOT a C41 film!?!

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  2. awesomesther


    Hmmm.. Is it really C-41? Cos I thought the B&W with C-41 is Kodak BW400CN?

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  3. falsedigital


    Ummm FP4+ is definitely not a C-41 film. I can't believe this article was's completely wrong. Come on Lomography...start reading your articles before you publish them...

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  4. wilfbiffherb


    sorry guys i made a booboo!!! was writing another article of c41 process at the same time and my mind obiously melted!!

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  5. -walsh-


    Ilford XP2 is C-41 process!

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  6. cornpony


    Great shots !

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  7. nicolas_noir


    @falsedigital That's a bit harsh! It's a slight error which anyone could make! There are worse reviews on here, with much worse pictures - the gallery is awesome!

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  8. wilfbiffherb


    thanks nicolas! PLEASE EVERYONE, FORGIVE ME!!

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  9. arzitek

    Nice pictures, some technical details are wrong but who cares? For those who care, I don't think vignetting can be caused by the type of film you would use, it seems to me it comes from the lens (or camera) you're using to shoot it?
    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  10. falsedigital


    @nicolas_noir - I don't think what I said was too harsh at all. If this was her blog and she made the error, no big deal. But this was on the front page of the website and a published article. I think it's very unprofessional of them to publish it without reading. Not to mention, it's still posted and corrections still haven't been made.

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  11. wilfbiffherb


    er, im not a girl

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  12. stouf


    Sweet !

    over 3 years ago · report as spam
  13. pangmark


    ha ha funniest review and comments page I've read yet! Bit of a bummer it didn't turn out to be true tho

    over 3 years ago · report as spam

Read this article in another language

This is the original article written in: English. It is also available in: Deutsch, 中文(繁體版) & Italiano.