Petzval_header_october_2014_en
Have an account? Login | New to Lomography? Register | Lab | Current Site:

Who Needs Photoshop When You Have Philippe Halsman?

If any of your whippersnapper friends insist that you need Photoshop to make your photos look good, better school them on the impeccable work of portrait artist Philippe Halsman, who made one of our time's most memorable photos through sheer determination. And lots of pissed off cats.

Dali Atomicus

When you see this brilliant portrait of Salavador Dali by photographer Philippe Halsman, you are rendered speechless. How can something so surreal be done without the help and intervention of computers and post-processing software? Is it even possible?

Of course its possible. However one has to remember, that “great art isn’t a coincidence or a singular act — producing art requires practice, numerous mistakes, and attention to detail that makes the final product look effortless.” (quote from informercantile.com) Halsman himself, didn’t get to his breathtaking image, the Dali Atomicus with one shot but with actually 28.

The Atomicus photo, the most famous of the Halsman/Dali colaborration, took 28 takes — “after each exposure, while the assistants mopped the floor and reclaimed cats, Halsman developed the film to see the progress in the composition. Accidents would happen. The water, intended for the cats, would cover Dali’s face instead.”

Without a shadow of a doubt, Philippe Halsman is one of the greatest photographers in the history of man, showing us how impossible shots are far from impossible. All it takes is a lot of hard work, and lots of lucid cats.

Here’s a few more of his work, all of which had zero Photoshop done!

sources:

written by cruzron

24 comments

  1. stouf

    stouf

    These are incredible ! But the first was post-processed, if not, how would you explain the difference in grain/contrast between the first shot and the second of the first gallery ? Anyway, it's true there was no photoshop to put all these things together in the same shot... And that's insane !

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  2. shoujoai

    shoujoai

    wow!

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  3. vgzalez

    vgzalez

    amazing!!

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  4. leela_dark

    leela_dark

    hihi, I have this in my kitchen: http://www.lomograph(…)ye/10995202

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  5. fash_on

    fash_on

    there's sooo much you can do "In Camera" if you know how and have the urge to create, I am constantly annoyed by people thinking my pics are photoshopped, both film and digital.

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  6. ramireo

    ramireo

    I've seen that picture before and I saw it again here. As always, I'm speechless ♥

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  7. realmustache

    realmustache

    mmmmmmm dali

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  8. realmustache

    realmustache

    hi-res goodness to drool over

    http://www.amazing-p(…)halsman.jpg

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  9. mikahsupageek

    mikahsupageek

    holy crackers !

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  10. fivedayforecast

    fivedayforecast

    @ Stouf, I don't believe the first photo was post processed. The other ones are outtakes and were probably not printed to perfection as the first one was. He took 28 frames of that image before he was satisfied so he probably didn't really care about the others and those photos are most likely just old forgotten prints that are heavily damaged.

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  11. fivedayforecast

    fivedayforecast

    I especially love #4 in the last gallery!

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  12. cinzinc

    cinzinc

    a new challenge for ourselves =)

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  13. donski_chan

    donski_chan

    what a bloody genius! never have i wanted a new tripod this badly. i can't wait to start chucking my cats around :))
    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  14. susielomovitz

    susielomovitz

    two genius together! amazing. I love that photo. @stouf : all photos are processed, in the moment you go into the lab, that's a process.... isn't it? I totally agree with @fivedayforecast .

    THIS ARTICLE IS REALLY INSPIRING!

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  15. azabanana

    azabanana

    what a great artist! poor kitties tho!

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  16. stouf

    stouf

    @fivedayforecast and @susielomovitz : Here is the original: (http://upload.wikime(…)_09633u.jpg), please compare to the one of this post (http://photos.lomogr(…)a704805.jpg)

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  17. stouf

    stouf

    I like this one though: (http://3.bp.blogspot(…)tomicus.jpg)

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  18. tallgrrlrocks

    tallgrrlrocks

    now THAT is talent!

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  19. shoujoai

    shoujoai

    People are angry enough when I use a flash taking pictures of their animals... what would they say when I throw them in the air and throw water allover them? ^_^ but the cat is so funny, I have to look at it again and again :D

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  20. fivedayforecast

    fivedayforecast

    Can't you raise contrast while printing? I dont know I know very little about analog printing. But I think you're missing the point @Stouf, it's more incredible that they got everything to levetate anaolg-ly (new word?) and the editing later is just a little touch of perfection.

    Look at the forest not the trees my friend.

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  21. stouf

    stouf

    You're absolutely right my friend, it is indeed possible to modify the contrast during printing. The original print is here (http://upload.wikime(…)_09633u.jpg). Now open another window and look for example at the strange glow around the upper cat here (http://photos.lomogr(…)a704805.jpg) this can only be obtained by digital retouching (or in rare holly cases, with a particular weather/light in analogue shots). In my personal opinion this is a vulgar digital manipulation (not made by the author for obvious chronological reasons) and not a touch of perfection. Now this is a very personal interpretation, and I wouldn't like it to disturb in any way our friendship ! : ) And in my first comment I was pretty clear about the fact that the levitation was the thing making this shot an absolute masterpiece...

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  22. stouf

    stouf

    And this debate made me think of one shot (http://www.lomograph(…)os/11518324) And ho ! You commented it very well ! : )

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  23. yarglags

    yarglags

    Ok, I've got enough cats but not enough people to do the throwing. 8D

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam
  24. remahor

    remahor

    halsman rules.......... MMMMiiiiiiau .....

    almost 4 years ago · report as spam

Read this article in another language

This is the original article written in: English. It is also available in: Spanish, 한국어, Deutsch, Português & 中文(繁體版).