You are currently not logged in – Login or register | Current Site:

Kodak bw400 CN (120, 400 iso) User-Review
written by paper_doll on April 15th, 2009 , 10 comments (8 votes)

I only use B&W film on rainy/dark days, but I live in Portugal, so although I love this kind film, I rarely use it, as you can imagine!

A few weeks ago, me and my friend went to an abandoned factory. We were going to shoot mostly indoors and it was a very cloudy day, so I thought it was better to take B&W film along with my trusty Holga. I also used it later to take a couple of shots in a screen-printing workshop (very little light in the room, so I had to use the flash). The pictures came out great, some even better than I expected!

This medium format film is perfect to use in any situation, but it works indoors much better. Another great thing about it is that it’s processed in colour negative chemistry (C-41) and printed on colour negative paper, so it’s very cheap and fast! I also love the grain and the smooth tones, they give a sweet vintage touch.

Some people might say that this film is not B&W (not the “real thing”), but I think the results beg to differ! I loved them and I will definitely use this film again!

Please login or register to use this feature.

10 comments

  • eyecon
    by eyecon
    6 months ago

    You are right - the results turned out awesome!

  • paper_doll
    by paper_doll
    6 months ago

    thanks!

  • stouf
    by stouf
    6 months ago

    Great review and gallery !!!

  • babo
    by babo
    6 months ago

    Adorei! Tb gosto muito do portra BW, mas ainda so o usei em 35mm

  • paper_doll
    by paper_doll
    6 months ago

    mas este não é portra! percebeste isso, certo? :) thanks

  • irbypace
    by irbypace
    6 months ago

    how did you do the slideshow? can you tell me on my home?

  • zulupt
    by zulupt
    6 months ago

    Grande review e fotos, parabens!!!
    Great review!

  • afd_lsi
    by afd_lsi
    6 months ago

    Nice review!

  • altprocess
    by altprocess
    6 months ago

    Good review that should help anyone that wants black and white images but cannot find a place to process them. It is certainly cheaper to get them processed than traditional black and white. However, I still prefer traditional black and white film. I do not like the tonal range of this film and depending where you get it processed the negatives can turn out with a purplish hue and often print that way. Again, the review is well done but this is not a film I'll buy again.

  • paper_doll
    by paper_doll
    6 months ago

    thanks everyone!

Opinion is free and discussion is encouraged on lomography.com, however, neither the content nor the ideas expressed in the comments are supported by or representative of the Lomographic Society International.

Most recent galleries in all sections

Most recent user submissions in all sections

Most recent entries in Films

Most recent entries in all other sections

Ongoing competitions

What events are up next?

Most popular tags in Films show all tags

110 220 autumn cats cheap chinese Chinese Film Clark Color Film classic clear copenhagen crossprocess digibase DNP Centuria 100 e-6 processing e6 Easypix ferrania film noir foma fomapan hie high definition holga Holga 120 CFN iso 400 iso400 kodachrome Kodachrome 64 lomography lc-a+ lomography redscalefilm long exposure lubitel magazine nps 160 olympus xa2 pan f + pink pocket film precisa québec red scale rms sepia sharpness slidefilm splitzer supra ufo image wherearemysunglasses

All sections