You are currently not logged in – Login or register | Current Site:

Ilford Deltapro (35mm, 3200 iso) user-review
written by callumbum on February 5th, 2009 , 6 comments (1 vote)

Shooting in the dark: A great film for gigs and concerts, I wouldn’t shoot it with a Fisheye though.

After experimenting with 1600 ISO film, I decided to take it up a notch and get some 3200 for a concert I was going to.
I stuck it inside my fisheye 2 and went on my merry way. I used a Colorsplash flash and was stood 1 or 2 meters away.
after developing I noticed that the pictures didn’t come out as well as I expected. The pictures weren’t ‘lit’ well enough for my liking but that may have been to do with the tiny aperture of the fisheye camera.

I would recommend this to a camera which has a larger aperture or for those with a variable aperture ones and I won’t be writing it off completely yet.

Please login or register to use this feature.

6 comments

  • kirri-joy
    by kirri-joy
    10 months ago

    still some cool shots!

  • oldskool_rider
    by oldskool_rider
    10 months ago

    cool, ive never used anything that fast, ive got a 1600 waiting to be developed, but thats as quick as ive got. im tempted to try this now

  • deff1
    by deff1
    10 months ago

    Great review, i just got a role of 3200 so will be using advice when shooting with it! cheers

  • fivedayforecast
    by fivedayforecast
    6 months ago

    the frige shot is a really neat idea!

  • jackievision
    by jackievision
    5 months ago

    everyone using this film should note that, according to developing tests and experiences, its actual speed is a bit below 3200 ISO. So, if exposed for 3200 and developed according to the suggested procedures, a slight push processing is applied by default and this is likely to be the cause of some over-closed shadows, together with the tiny aperture :)

  • by coffeeaddict_nl
    3 months ago

    if you browse the ilfordphoto.com website you can find some pretty useful specs on this film. They (ilford) have measured it at 1000 ISO. They have also included some usefull development vs. exposure alternatives (eg; when exposed as a 400 ISO, the development time gets significantly shorter)

Opinion is free and discussion is encouraged on lomography.com, however, neither the content nor the ideas expressed in the comments are supported by or representative of the Lomographic Society International.

Most recent galleries in all sections

Most recent user submissions in all sections

Most recent entries in Films

Most recent entries in all other sections

Ongoing competitions

What events are up next?

Most popular tags in Films show all tags

220 24 exposures 800iso blueish brazil brownish cats chinese Chinese Film Clark Color Film classic clear cream crossprocess digibase DNP Centuria 100 e6 experiment film noir film review of the week fisheye 2 foma fomapan hannover holga infrared iso 400 iso400 Kodachrome 64 lc-a+ rl lomo magazine Memories Film olympus xa2 pan f + pink pocket film Precisa precisa red scale rms scan sepia sharpness slide slidefilm supra transparancy ufo image Velvia

All sections