You are currently not logged in – Login or register | Current Site:

Diana Mini : Does Size Matter?
written by ndroo on September 15th, 2009 , 5 comments (12 votes)

  • Tags
  • Brand
    Lomography
  • Name
    Diana Mini
  • Format
    35mm
  • Focus
    zone focus
  • Exposure
    fully manual
  • Advance
    uncoupled to shutter
  • ISO Speeds
  • Cable Release
    yes
  • Tripod Screw Mount
    yes
  • plastic

I quickly loaded a roll of expired negative (200) and started firing away at 10pm around home and on the way to work the next morning. By lunch the test roll was ready.

So what do I think of this super cute little Diana Mini? It is …

1. Cute and small.

2. The feature to allow switching between the square format & half frame is way cool. No more banging my head on the wall trying to finish 72 frames on a normal half frame camera!

3. Able to trigger the shutter without having to fully advance a frame means it is possible to make crazy pano shots.

4. The shutter release is not as ‘loose’ as the Diana F+ cameras … this means less risk of accidentally firing a shot.

5. You can use a shutter release cable on it without having to buy an adapter (like in the Diana F+).

6. The little film counter behind the camera is a little too small. Hmm. How big can they make it, since the cam is so tiny? Hahaha! Must be my old eyes that’s to blame.

7. Lens cap seems to fall off easily. Be careful with it.

8. Doing multiple exposures is a piece of cake with the Mini. Just like the Diana F+ cameras, you can just press the shutter release as many times as you want without having to use any multi-exposure (MX) buttons/switch.

9. The supplied strap is a little clumsy on the little cam. I removed mine and will find a wrist strap instead.

10. The distance ‘dial’ in front of the lens is a little too small for fat fingers like mine and also the ‘arrow’ that points to the printed distance guide … is pretty hard to look at because the ‘arrow’ is black and the background of the front (where the 1-2M, 2-4M etc are) is also back. Possibly the problem is due to my lousy fuzzy eyeballs though.

11. Cute and small (did I already mention this?)

Do I like it? If course I do! It’s a must-have if you love the Diana F+ camera and a definitely-must-have if you love cute and cool cameras.

Please login or register to use this feature.

5 comments

  • dogma
    by dogma
    2 months ago

    Nice review!

  • stouf
    by stouf
    2 months ago

    ndroo rocks the house once again ! Great review !

  • disdis
    by disdis
    2 months ago

    GREAT!!!!!

  • ndroo
    by ndroo
    2 months ago

    Thanks. :D I thought this review might never make it because I listed some not-so-good points up there. Hahaha. But then what's a review if it's all about praising and nothing -ve? :D I like the mini though. I am having a 2nd one on the way here too. :D

  • deniselai
    by deniselai
    2 months ago

    haha! the viewfinder's pretty small too! but i must say the mini is tough!

Opinion is free and discussion is encouraged on lomography.com, however, neither the content nor the ideas expressed in the comments are supported by or representative of the Lomographic Society International.

Most recent galleries in all sections

Most recent user submissions in all sections

Most recent entries in Cameras

Most recent entries in all other sections

Ongoing competitions

What events are up next?

Most popular tags in Cameras show all tags

120 film akira toy camera amphibia beauty bling byu-n 16 capture carl zeiss Chaika ll Cheap chinese clear daylight Disposable fast lens Felix Edmundovich Dzerzhinski folding camera fuji instax Ifbaflex Ilford Delta 3200 instant back+ Kodak T - MAX konica hexar af leica copy light leak lomo :) MF modification multi exposure multilens multiple olympus olympus xa2 people Polaroid supershooter instant film peel-apart packfilm retro vintage precise Rangefinder Rollei Magic single-lens sonar sprocket holes stylish Time topcon velveeta victor hasselblad wallet-sized water xa2 Yashica

All sections