You are currently not logged in – Login or register | Current Site:

Those Lost Pictures
written by disdis on October 22nd, 2009 , 9 comments (8 votes)

Yesterday I decided to organise my negatives. It was Spanish day and I don’t feel like watching the army parade. So I started labelling my rolls. Suddenly some of pictures I saw were strange to me. I checked it once, twice… uhmm, I don’t remember having this! These rolls were there for 2 years and some of the pictures hadn’t been seeing. So I decided to scan the negatives. They were destroyed as I’m not the most organised person in the world. Scratched, full of fingerprints … what a disaster. The first one made me almost give up but I went on. Some of the pictures were not good enough but who is the one that decides a picture isn’t worthy to be shown? Some of them, even with the light leaks, the scratches and the fingerprints look good enough to submit an entry or at least, create a “mistaken album”.

Some were taken with an Holga using 35mm film without back, others simply 120 films.

This is for beginners: when you take your films to the lab, check you have everything done. Sometimes they take the decision of killing your pictures!

Please login or register to use this feature.

9 comments

  • stouf
    by stouf
    about 1 month ago

    Hey, some are amazing and it would have been sad to miss them !

  • honeytrees
    by honeytrees
    about 1 month ago

    THIS ALWAYS HAPPENS TO ME!

  • ilovemydiana
    by ilovemydiana
    about 1 month ago

    i have a friend in a lab and he checks everything for me, so nice. i am planning on getting a scanner though, because the reason he checks them so well is because their scanner decides what is and is not a good picture...

  • disdis
    by disdis
    about 1 month ago

    Of course, my scanner is not the best for negatives but anyway... as this is something that usually happens with some labs... Maybe some of the pictures could become better if I had a good scanner.

  • breakphreak
    by breakphreak
    about 1 month ago

    lofi katchup

  • anarchy
    by anarchy
    about 1 month ago

    Great lo-fi =)))

  • pauladavies
    by pauladavies
    about 1 month ago

    man, this is one more thing that made me remember I have rolls of 35mm i haven't scanned i don't know why. maybe it's a sign i'll have a nice surprise. thanks for the tip!

  • trash-gordon-from-outer-space
    by trash-gordon-from-outer-space
    28 days ago

    I hate when they do it.

  • threemoons
    by threemoons
    25 days ago

    After I had my first two rolls from my first Diana totally screwed up by a lab (they kept scanning and printing in rectangular, not square format, and totally forgot to scan one roll--they scanned the same roll twice!) I bucked up and paid out for my own scanner. No regrets--I got a great Canon 8800 for under $200 and it's already paid for itself.

Opinion is free and discussion is encouraged on lomography.com, however, neither the content nor the ideas expressed in the comments are supported by or representative of the Lomographic Society International.

Most recent galleries in all sections

Most recent user submissions in all sections

Most recent entries in Blog

Most recent entries in all other sections

Ongoing competitions

What events are up next?

Most popular tags in Blog show all tags

2009 38mm analouge love bling boredbone button City Pulse david letterman Diana+ Flash doodle dream team flash mob fomapan Frankfurt fuji 55 giveaway Instant cameras klick light painting local lomo :) Lomographic X-pro Film Lomography Actionsampler Lomography Fisheye 2 Lomography X-pro Slide 200 LomoHomes manila patterns penguin people pink Russia Russian Winter sand wave Shop shout outs Snatch south america team Splinter sprocket holes stage 2 standard magazine submit the medium behind tracking united states urban water Yekaterinburg zorki 1

All sections